alt.energy.renewable

"0BN0Z" <0BN0Z@doooooooooooooodoooooooooo.com> wrote
> But as the argument unfolded I realised Spencer was drawing on
> observations and measurements from the new Aqua satellites to explain
> the mechanism behind this anomaly between model forecasts and
> observation. You may have heard that the IPCC models cannot predict
> clouds and rain with any accuracy. Their models assume water vapour goes
> up to the troposphere and hangs around to cook us all in a greenhouse
> future.

MMMMMMMOOOOOOOOORRRRRRRRRRROOOOOOOOONNNNNNNN

Cloud overlap effects on general circulation model climate simulations
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH, VOL. 102, NO. D10, PAGES 11,039-11,047,
1997

A comparison of the CCM3 Model Climate using diagnosed and predicted
condensate parameterizations
(1) National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, Colorado, ETATS-UNIS
(2) University of Oslo, Oslo, NORVEGE
Journal of climate ISSN 0894-8755

ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCE: Water Vapor Feedback in Climate Models
Science 4 November 2005: 795-796


APPLICATION OF A STOCHASTIC CLOUD MODEL

TO MIXED PHASE ARCTIC CLOUDS: AN OVERVIEW

Joseph F. Brodie* and Dana E. Veron

Department of Environmental Sciences, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ



A new convective cloud field model based on principles of

self-organisation

F. J. Nober1 and H. F. Graf1,*

1Centre for Atmospheric Science, University of Cambridge, UK

*also at: Max-Planck-Institute for Meteorology, Hamburg, Germany

Received: 21 January 2004 - Published in Atmos. Chem. Phys. Discuss.: 1 July
2004

Revised: 18 August 2005 - Accepted: 27 September 2005 - Published: 20
October 2005



And on and on it goes....................