alt.energy.renewable

On Mar 26, 4:49=A0pm, "0Z0BN" <0Z...@doooooooodoooooo.com> wrote:
> "Fran" wrote in message
>
> news:e5690391-9539-4895-a6be-f82e938bf003@s37g2000prg.googlegroups.com...
> On Mar 26, 3:05 pm, "0Z0BN" <0Z...@doooooooodoooooo.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> > "Fran" wrote in message
>
> >news:53f7f1a3-0ff5-47a2-b585-dfe2f7ab0f98@s12g2000prg.googlegroups.com...=

> > On Mar 26, 8:03 am, Tunderbar wrote:> Anyone who
> > can understand that 16 ppm of a trace gas like co2 cannot
> > > possibly cause catastrophic global warming is smart enough to know
> > > that agw is a fraud.
>
> > > So if you support the co2 =3D agw nonsense you are either too stupid
> > > to
> > > understand basic science or you have chosen to support a blatant
> > > fraud.
>
> > a) It's not 16 ppm -- it's 100 ppm since 1800.
> > *****************
>
> > ROTFLMAO
> > 100ppm and no discernible effect on global temperatures!
>
> Ample discernible effects. As you know, Mr Bonzo, there has been a
> continuous rise in near surface temperatures since the 1970s. It's
> likely that negative forcing from aerosols masked the positive forcing
> from GHGs and so it may well be that we are in for an even warmer next
> decade.
> ************************
>
> Warming from the 1970's to 1998.
> Cooling from 1998 to present.

You keep saying that and it keeps being wrong.

You've accused the scientific community of fraud in the service of
grants and a plan to return humanity to the Pleistocen era, but you
duch this challenge?

Instead of simply copying and pasting the latest disinformation from
the global polluters club, why not commit yourself to a claim? I'm
going to say I believe that the 2008 calendar year will go above the
average temperature for the years 1998-2007. Given that 1998 was an
El- Nino forced record, you ought to be willing to take up the
challenge,
right?


Fran





> So much for mythical AGW!
>