alt.education

On Mar 4, 5:46 am, Bob LeChevalier wrote:
> Wide Eyed in Wonder wrote:
>
> >All you need to know about Bob's view of myself is that he has
> >attacked me for years on a number of problems, even when I sought
> >peace. I've broken off conversation many times, and each time he acts
> >like a spoiled little brat, suggesting that I gave up due to being
> >wrong.
>
> Actually I don't do that very often. Usually someone else does. But
> you think that everyone who criticizes you is really one person, so
> you can't tell.
>
> >...pumping me to get back into the fight.
>
> No. That is most certainly NOT what I want.

Cool. So, I can expect you to not use inflammatory words and such?

> >I idiotically
>
> yes
>

I guess not.

> >I'm not exactly sure what Bob's agenda
>
> On topic, intelligent, mature.
>
> >I thought that posting pure Educational posts on these groups
> >would allow for a normal conversation,
>
> and you have gotten same, even from me, when you make a serious
> effort. But when you start playing games or being childish, I am past
> the point of having pity for you. Instead I pity the children.
>

A> You JUST admitted I was posting on-topic and civil posts, during
which you were attacking me.

B> Even here, you include inflammatory text.

> >but he is right there looking
> >to condemn me for being everything from an idiot to a fascist.
>
> I don't have to look. You shove it in people's face.
>

Inflammatory text, again.

> >In fact, HE is the main reason I get defensive on these groups
>
> Excuses, excuses. Take some responsibility for your own behavior,
> child.
>
> lojbab

Sure, Bob. Whatever. It's all my fault, and I'm pure evil. Can we
get back on topic, now, instead of just attacking me?

Kenneth Clifton
christiansuperhero.com