Group: alt.education
From: Bob LeChevalier
Date: Sunday, March 02, 2008 12:02 AM
Subject: Re: ABCTE is a Good Idea!

Wide Eyed in Wonder wrote:
>On Mar 1, 7:59 am, Bob LeChevalier wrote:
>> Wide Eyed in Wonder wrote:
>>
>> >There are some teacher unions that fear this program could...I
>> >guess...put them out of business.
>>
>> No. They probably fear that it could put incompetent jerks like you
>> in a classroom, and they'd be right.
>>
>> >Now....let the "attack the religious nut / conservative" session
>> >begin, with all the lies and hypocrisy I expect.
>>
>> It has nothing to do with your being a "conservative", and not much to
>> do with your being a "religious nut", though I suspect that
>> constitution violations would be a regular thing with you in the
>> "pulpit" of the classroom.
>>
>> Your behavior in the newsgroups is why no one respects you. Your
>> seemingly willful lack of reading comprehension makes it scary to
>> think that you might teach some kid to read the way you do, not to
>> mention the things that you are sure you know that are absolutely
>> wrong.
>>
>> I'm curious what subject you are going to try to qualify in.
>
>Thank you, Bob, for providing EXACTLY what I expected and just enough
>rope to hang yourself. You don't even know what subject, apparently
>and despite my mention of it, that I am interested in teaching
>(Elementary Education...possibly Special Education..both avail through
>ABCTE), yet you know enough to completely judge me.

I don't "completely" judge you.

But based solely on your net-performance, I wouldn't hire you for
anything, and would not consider your qualified to teach no matter how
many tests you took or credits you bought.

> Further, without
>any evidence or testimony from myself, you "suspect" that I would
>preach from the classroom, despite repeated denials of this on these
>newsgroups by myself.

You are a liar and a hypocrite. Why should I believe you?

> What do you call someone that makes conclusions
>based upon unsupported assumptions (in fact in violation of
>testimony), based upon ones ideology?

My conclusion is based on your on-line behavior which is all I really
know about you (since you could be lying about all the rest), not on
any assumptions.

I have no ideology.

lojbab

Safety Articles | Usenet Groups | Usenet News | Bluegrass