alt.education

On Wed, 02 Apr 2008 12:00:54 -0400, buckeye
wrote:

>Info Junkie wrote:
>
>>:|On Sun, 30 Mar 2008 07:46:43 -0400, buckeye
>>:|wrote:
>>:|
>>:|>Info Junkie wrote:
>>:|>
>>:|>>:|http://www.onenewsnow.com/Legal/Default.aspx?id=73679
>>:|>
>>:|>
>>:|>Isn't it a shame that an attorney is either so stupid or such a liar and
>>:|>propagandist that they would would even resort to saying the following:
>>:|>
>>:|>"This country was founded as a Christian nation. Yes, there is religious
>>:|>pluralism, but we don't need to lie about the past." Instead, says
>>:|>Fitschen, Americans "need to honor ... and build on the past -- not rewrite
>>:|>history." Attorney and president of the National Legal Foundation, Steven
>>:|>W. Fitschen,
>>:|
>>:|What may be the "shame" is your personal attack fallacy against the
>>:|attorney's opinion as it neither changes the facts surrounding Court's
>>:|opinion nor their ruling.
>
>Focusing attention on his stupidity or his lies whichever applies.
>
>I guess that was too complex for you to understand, huh?

A personal attack fallacy remains a fallacy nonetheless, and " it
neither changes the facts surrounding Court's opinion nor their ruling
eh? LOL

OTOH, in a 9th Circuit court ruling you agreed with...what did you
post to another who disagreed with the ruling?

From: buckeye-ELO@nospam.net
Subject: Re: Time for 9th cir ct justices to go
Message-ID:

"You are like the employer who bitches because a employee dripped
blood on the employee restroom floor. While you work very hard trying
to keep out all the information that places it in context, such as the
fact he was dripping blood on the restroom floor because a machine in
your factory had ripped off his hand. He dripped blood on that floor
because other employees had rushed him into that restroom as they
tried to stem the blood loss as they waited the arrival of the
ambulance.

All of that is important and relevant to fully understanding the blood
on the restroom floor. Just as all the facts that people keep
posting, but you don't want to have to deal with, is important to
fully understanding this whole circuit court situation."

Looks like your "(f)ocusing attention...'like the employer who bitches
because a employee dripped blood on the employee restroom floor.'"

It appears the term "hypocrite" applies to your comments quite nicely.

NG readers may now expect a post from you to try and *justify* your
fallacious post...including ad hominem towards me of course ....but
never quite addressing proofs that the Court's ruling was in error.

Have fun... ROTFLMHO.