Group: linux.gentoo.user
From: Anthony Metcalf
Date: Tuesday, April 08, 2008 9:50 AM
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] mtune=k6-2 and a *small* upgrade

This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156)
--------------enig7BFE93666672DBE525C1865C
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Alan McKinnon wrote:
> On Tuesday 08 April 2008, Anthony Metcalf wrote:
> =20
>> =EF=BF=BD =EF=BF=BD But what else? Will mtune=3Dk6-2 make executables =
that will run on
>> an Athlon 64? Anyone tried this? Would I get to a point where I could
>> make -e world and have a nice working system?
>> =20
>
> k6 is 32 bit right?
>
> There's no sane upgrade path to amd64, looks like you are in for a=20
> reinstall
>
> =20
Yes, 32bit, and Athlon 64s ran x86 last I heard :)

The 64bit argument is one I will have to consider more deeply, but=20
certainly in the near term, I won't gain anything from it, as I don't do =

*any* of the things the extended memory range is good for, and don't=20
need more than 4GB RAM.......

Later when I upgrade to a phenom, and stick 1GB RAM per core in there,=20
then yeah, I will probably recompile into 64bit, but that can be done in =

a chroot, and migrated fairly easily I would expect, so long as the=20
system is running.


--------------enig7BFE93666672DBE525C1865C
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFH+4SGYSRPRMC0Fr4RAlaRAJ9ybjK0lONyEvWtsZvGrVKWnuW1bACfdhKX
CM/42Tp61bG0Ao9BWr4QzAA=
=AkmK
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--------------enig7BFE93666672DBE525C1865C--
--
gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list

Safety Articles | Usenet Groups | Usenet News | Bluegrass