linux.gentoo.user

Steve schrieb:
> I can't believe that I'm the only person with this, so it's probably
> worth asking.
>
> I'm one of the (many) people who has opportunists trying usernames and
> passwords against SSH... while every effort has been made to secure
> this service by configuration; strong passwords; no root login
> remotely etc. I would still prefer to block sites using obvious
> dictionary attacks against me.
>
> I used to use DenyHosts - but that became annoying as it used rather a
> lot of resources (and relied upon tcp wrappers... which, I'm informed
> are somewhat old-fashioned)
>
> I migrated to try using iptables as my firewall and using blacklist.py
> - which I got working after some minor config-tweaking. I'm aware
> that there is configuration in the blacklist.py script for
> BLOCKING_PERIOD - but what I really miss the "blocked forever" nature
> of the DenyHosts alternative.... though I prefer every other aspect of
> the iptables/blacklist.py approach.
>
> Has anyone else resolved this? As far as I'm concerned, once I detect
> someone has attempted a brute force (which blaclist.py does
> fantastically well) what I want is for no further communication to be
> accepted from the IP address - even after I reboot etc. While I don't
> know which sites I want to be accessible from in advance, I can be
> sure none of them would launch a brute force attack against me. :-)
>
> Recommendations?
>
> I'm looking for the neatest Gentoo way to do this... rather than
> recommendations for how to write something to do what I want from
> scratch...
>
> Steve
>

Try fail2ban. I started as newby on iptables and I still am, because it
is very easy to configure and does it job perfect.

http://gentoo-wiki.com/HOWTO_fail2ban
http://www.fail2ban.org/wiki/index.php/Main_Page
--
gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org mailing list